![]() |
|
Testing the Die Roller - Printable Version +- Furiously Eclectic People (http://furiouslyeclectic.com/forum) +-- Forum: Toying with Sardonicism (http://furiouslyeclectic.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: ə SCHWA (http://furiouslyeclectic.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Testing the Die Roller (/showthread.php?tid=50) |
Testing the Die Roller - Kersus - 04-19-2014 I attack! 1d12 rolled for a total of: 11 (11) RE: Testing the Die Roller - Kersus - 04-19-2014 2d6 rolled for a total of: 4 (3, 1) 1d24+7 rolled for a total of: 16 (9, +7) Can't change via edit. Nice! RE: Testing the Die Roller - Kersus - 04-19-2014 Utilize terminology [forwardslash] [dice or roll] [space] [#ofdice] d [die facets] Preview won't show it, you must post. RE: Testing the Die Roller - Oedipussy Rex - 05-14-2014 (04-19-2014, 01:57 AM)Kersus Wrote: Utilize terminology [forwardslash] [dice or roll] [space] [#ofdice] d [die facets] /roll (d16-d3+3)d3 Doesn't appear to handle nesting /roll d16-d3+3 with or without parenthesis Attack: /roll d16 Armor: /roll d3-1 Defense: 2 Maybe it just doesn't like edits at all Attack: 1d16 rolled for a total of: 13 (13) Armor: 1d3 rolled for a total of: 3 (3)-1 Defense: 2 Or maybe I need to put the "1" in front of the d Damage: (13-2-2)d3: 9d3 rolled for a total of: 17 (2, 2, 3, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1) RE: Testing the Die Roller - Kersus - 06-04-2014 1d8 rolled for a total of: 4 (4)-3 RE: Testing the Die Roller - Kersus - 06-04-2014 1d8 rolled for a total of: 8 (8)-3 1d8+3 rolled for a total of: 11 (8, +3) 1d16 rolled for a total of: 3 (3) 1d8+1 rolled for a total of: 8 (7, +1)d4 RE: Testing the Die Roller - Kersus - 06-06-2014 1d77 rolled for a total of: 48 (48) |